Skip to main content

Agricultural outlook improves on good harvests, federal aid

Third-quarter 2020 agricultural credit conditions survey

November 9, 2020

Author

Joe Mahon Director, Regional Outreach
Agricultural outlook improves on good harvests, federal aid key image
James Brey/Getty Images

Article Highlights

  • Farm incomes down slightly in third quarter, outlook for fourth quarter slightly up
  • Other indicators of farm finances stabilized
  • Mild improvement due to government relief, good production, and small price increases, lenders said
Agricultural outlook improves on good harvests, federal aid

After multiple years of tough financial conditions for agriculture, COVID-19 might have been expected to deal another major blow to the sector. But pandemic-relief aid along with mostly bountiful harvests in the Ninth District and a slight recovery in prices have painted an optimistic picture for the end of 2020, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis’ third-quarter (October) agricultural credit conditions survey. “Increasing farm commodity prices and COVID-related government programs have most farmers sitting OK,” reported a Wisconsin agricultural banker responding to the survey.

Farm incomes fell from July through September 2020 relative to the same period a year earlier, according to lenders surveyed. Spending on capital equipment and farm household purchases also decreased. Loan demand fell slightly, while falling incomes pushed the rate of loan repayment down, and renewals and extensions increased. Land values increased slightly across district states, and interest rates on loans decreased further from the previous quarter. However, the outlook for the fourth quarter is more optimistic, with lenders in the district generally expecting farm incomes to increase.

Farm income, household spending, and capital investment

In contrast to recent surveys in which strong majorities of bankers reported decreased farm incomes, half of district lenders surveyed in the third quarter said incomes were unchanged from a year earlier, compared with 39 percent who reported that incomes decreased (see chart). The same percentage reported that household spending fell, while 5 percent said it increased. Farms also spent less on buildings and equipment—58 percent of lenders reported decreased capital spending, and only 2 percent said it increased.

Loading chart 1...

Loan repayments and renewals

The rate of repayment on agricultural loans largely held steady, reflecting the mild improvement in farm finances, while renewals increased somewhat. Loan repayments were unchanged from a year earlier, according to 71 percent of respondents, while 23 percent reported that repayment rates decreased. A third of lenders stated that the number of renewals or extensions increased, while most of the remainder said renewal activity was unchanged. Only 6 percent reported decreased renewals. No banks reported having refused a loan due to a shortage of funds.

Demand for loans, required collateral, and interest rates

Demand for loans decreased slightly on balance, according to lenders. While nearly two-thirds of respondents indicated that loan demand was unchanged from a year ago, 23 percent noted increased loan demand. This result also pointed to some improvement in farm finances and stood in contrast to recent surveys, in which larger shares of lenders were reporting increased or unchanged loan demand. Collateral requirements on loans have held steady, according to 85 percent of lenders surveyed, with the balance reporting increases in collateral requirements.

Fixed and variable interest rates for operating, machinery, and real estate loans all decreased from the previous quarter.

Cash rents and land values

The recent trend of declining farmland values appeared to have halted in the third quarter. The average value for nonirrigated cropland in the district increased by 3 percent from a year earlier, according to survey respondents. Irrigated land values rose by slightly less than 3 percent, while ranch- and pastureland values were unchanged on average.

Cash rents held more steady. The district average rent for nonirrigated land dropped less than 1 percent. Rents for irrigated land increased a little more than 1 percent, while ranchland rents were flat.

Outlook

“Recent rally in the grain market combined with more government support program money should make for a good last quarter in 2020 for farm incomes,” said a Minnesota banker in a survey comment.

The outlook among many other respondents was similarly upbeat about agricultural incomes, but the overall outlook for farm finances was more modest. Across the district, a third of lenders expected farm income to increase in the fourth quarter, compared with just under a quarter who expected further decline. The forecast for capital spending was more moderate, with 31 percent of respondents expecting decreases, compared with 24 percent who expected increases. Two-thirds of lenders thought farm household spending would remain unchanged.

Nearly half of respondents projected demand for loans to remain unchanged in the final three months of 2020, while 37 percent expected increased loan demand. About a fifth of bankers expected loan repayment rates to decline, and 31 percent forecast increased renewals and extensions. A strong majority expected no change in the amount of required collateral on loans.


Appendix - State Fact Sheet
Agricultural Credit Conditions Survey
Third-Quarter 2020
Note: The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is not part of the survey.
 MNMTNDSDWINinth District
Percent of respondents who reported decreased levels for the past three months compared with the same period last year:
Rate of loan repayments 35 20 27 11 23
Net farm income 45 40 47 33 39
Farm household spending 40 60 33 44 39
Farm capital spending 60 60 60 61 25 58
Loan demand 25 40 20 17 25 23
Percent of respondents who reported increased levels for the past three months compared with the same period last year:
Loan renewals or extensions 55 20 27 22 25 34
Referrals to other lenders 15 20 6 3
Amount of collateral required 20 7 17 25 15
Loan demand 15 33 25 15
Appendix - State Fact Sheet - Outlook
Agricultural Credit Conditions Survey
Third-Quarter 2020
Note: The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is not part of the survey.
 MNMTNDSDWINinth District
Percent of respondents who expect decreased levels for the next three months:
Rate of loan repayments 15 40 13 22 18
Net farm income 25 40 27 22 24
Farm household spending 15 40 20 22 19
Farm capital spending 35 40 27 33 31
Loan demand 20 7 22 15
Percent of respondents who expect increased levels for the next three months:
Loan renewals or extensions 40 40 33 17 25 31
Referrals to other lenders 15 20 11 5
Amount of collateral required 20 17 11
Loan demand 35 60 40 33 25 37
Agricultural Interest rates from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Survey of Agricultural Credit Conditions  
  Operating Machinery Real Estate
  Fixed Var. Fixed Var. Fixed Var.
Q4-18 January 6.2 6.0 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.7
Q1-19 April 6.4 6.2 6.2 6.0 6.0 5.8
Q2-19 July 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.7
Q3-19 October 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.5
Q4-19 January 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.3
Q1-20 April 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.1 4.9 4.8
Q2-20 July 5.1 4.9 5.0 4.8 4.8 4.6
Q3-20 October 5.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.5
Joe Mahon
Director, Regional Outreach

Joe Mahon is a Minneapolis Fed regional outreach director. Joe’s primary responsibilities involve tracking several sectors of the Ninth District economy, including agriculture, manufacturing, energy, and mining.