Quarterly Review 2611

Decades Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile Since 1980

Patrick J. Kehoe | Stanford University, University College London, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Timothy J. Kehoe | Consultant
Raimundo Soto
Raphael Bergoeing

Winter 2002

Both Chile and Mexico experienced severe economic crises in the early 1980s, yet Chile recovered much faster than Mexico. This study analyzes four possible explanations for this difference and rules out three, explanations based on money supply expansion, real wage and real exchange rate declines, and foreign debt overhangs. The fourth explanation is based on government policy reforms in the two countries. Using growth accounting and a calibrated growth model, the study determines that the only policy reforms promising as explanations are those that primarily affect total factor productivity, or how inputs are used, not the inputs themselves. Interpreting historical evidence with economic theory, the study concludes that the crucial difference between Chile and Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s is earlier government policy reforms in Chile, particularly reforms in policies affecting the banking system and bankruptcy procedures.

Download Paper (pdf)