Current comment by businessmen and bankers, as reported by the
twelve Reserve Banks, is decidedly more pessimistic than that of a
month ago. The pervasive dampening effect of the General Motors
strike is evident in most parts of the country. Employment continues
to weaken, or at best, to show sluggish growth, in most Districts,
while unemployment is reportedly rising further in several areas. On
balance, reports emphasize continued weakness in consumer spending,
and some further cutbacks or stretchouts of capital spending plans.
Reports are mixed on the behavior of prices, but strong upward wage
pressures continue to restrain any widespread belief that inflation
will soon be under control. Residential construction activity is
improving somewhat in parts of the country, but reports vary widely
as to the degree of the recovery. Inflows of savings to financial
institutions continue to grow, and somewhat easier mortgage terms
seem to be available. Loan demand by consumers, potential home
builders, and businesses is reported to be weak on balance, and is
aggravated by problems in specific areas and industries.
In the past month, there has been some widening of the impact of the
General Motors strike upon the economy. The two Districts in which
the effect is most direct are Chicago and Cleveland, although the
Chicago report indicates that after adjusting for the strike,
economic activity in that District is level to slightly up. Seven
out of the ten major metropolitan areas in the Cleveland District,
however, are adversely affected, and other Districts—New York,
Atlanta, St. Louis, and Dallas—trace either direct or indirect
dampening effects to the strike. The Philadelphia report contains
the suggestion that the underlying economic trend is weaker than
generally acknowledged, and perhaps too much blame is placed upon
the strike.
Numerous other strikes have had widespread effects as well—
construction workers in Kansas City; carpenters, household
appliances, construction machinery, and other autos in the Chicago
District; and airlines in the Minneapolis District.
Weakness in the employment picture is traceable to strikes as well
as to cutbacks in government spending affecting the aerospace and
aircraft industries in the Atlanta and San Francisco Districts. Also
blamed for layoffs are cutbacks in business capital spending
affecting the machine tool industry in the Boston and Cleveland
Districts, and the computer industry in the Cleveland and
Minneapolis Districts. Slackening steel production is a source of
weakness in the Cleveland District, and the textile industry has
accounted for some sluggishness in the Richmond and Atlanta
Districts. A less-than-seasonal buildup of employment by retailers
is also mentioned.
District reports describe consumer spending variously from
satisfactory to very bad. The consensus is clearly less than
satisfactory, particularly for "big ticket" items. Only the Chicago
District describes the outlook for consumer durable purchases as
optimistic. Retailers' inventories are generally being held down,
and holiday season buildups are apparently lower than usual.
Residential construction is reported to be improved in the St.
Louis, Minneapolis, and Kansas City Districts. In the latter case,
the improvement follows a prolonged strike in several of the
building trades. Residential building continues weak, however, in
the Boston, Richmond, Atlanta, and San Francisco Districts.
While the liquidity positions of financial institutions are reported
to have improved, the consensus of the reports is that loan demand
remains weak. In some Districts this is reported to have led to
greater investment in municipal securities by banks, and there is
some speculation about the possibility of an imminent cut in the
prime rate.
Some moderation in the growth of prices is mentioned in the
Richmond, Chicago, Dallas, and San Francisco reports. In some areas,
consumers are continuing to shift to lower-to-medium priced goods,
and price shading of consumer items is reported. Concern continues
to be voiced, however, about the problem of controlling inflation in
view of recent labor settlements which have resulted in large wage
increases, for example, in the St. Louis and Kansas City Districts.
Increases in gas and electric utility rates and in prices of public
services are of concern in the Atlanta District. The potential need
for incomes policies in order to control inflation in the face of
rising unemployment and continued upward pressure on wages is
mentioned by respondents to surveys in the Boston and Philadelphia
Districts.